REVIEW article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Health Technology Implementation
Volume 6 – 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1490156
Provisionally accepted
- 1
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, London, United Kingdom - 2
Brain+, Copenhagen, Denmark - 3
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council (Uganda), Entebbe, Uganda
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please
login
You don’t have a Frontiers account ? You can
register here
Background: Digital Healthcare Solutions (DHS) are transforming healthcare by improving patients’ experiences, safety and quality of care. However, despite all the proposed and observed advantages of DHS, a growing body of research suggests that these DHS are not equally accessible to all. This research aimed to assess whether equity frameworks for digital health solutions can be used to guide the development of digital health solutions to increase access to care for dementia patients in the UK and, thereafter, develop practical guidelines to guide the design of equitable DHS products to address this growing issue. Methods: A scoping review across four databases and grey literature was done to identify equity frameworks and design principles for DHS. The equity frameworks and design principles were analyzed to make recommendations on increasing equity in the product. Results: 34 publications and reports met the inclusion criteria. Four equity frameworks were analyzed and one was selected. Equitable product development guidelines were created based on patient-centered design principles. Conclusion: Although DHS can increase inequity in healthcare, concrete methods and practical guidelines can minimize this if DHS developers design for maximum equity and closely collaborate with healthcare providers and end-users in product development. Future research could use these guidelines to test usability for developers and investigate other equitable approaches like institutional barriers to adoption.
Keywords:
digital health solutions, Practical guidelines, Equity, Dementia, UK
Received:
03 Sep 2024;
Accepted:
10 Dec 2024.
Copyright:
© 2024 Wolff, Nielsen and Kiwanuka. This is an
open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted
academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which
does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Achilles Kiwanuka, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Medical Research Council (Uganda), Entebbe, Uganda
Disclaimer:
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and
do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or
those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that
may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its
manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
link

